Cases by Issue - Antitrust

NLRB v. Longshoremen

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:20:35 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

84-861

Petitioner

National Labor Relations Board

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Longshoremen

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Decided By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Opinion

473 U.S. 61 (1985)

Argued

Tuesday, April 23, 1985

Decided

Thursday, June 27, 1985

Advocates

Norton J. Come (on behalf of the petitioner)

Donato Caruso (on behalf of respondents New York Shipping Association, et al)

Ernest L. Mathews, Jr. (on behalf of respondents International Longshoremen's Association, et al)

James Alan Lips (on behalf of the respondents American Trucking Associations, et al. in support of the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Longshoremen, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Shepard v. NLRB

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:33:02 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

81-1627

Petitioner

Shepard

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

National Labor Relations Board

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Decided By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Opinion

459 U.S. 344 (1983)

Argued

Monday, December 6, 1982

Decided

Tuesday, January 18, 1983

Advocates

Edwin S. Kneedler (on behalf of the Respondents)

Robert F. Gore (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for NLRB, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc. v. NLRB

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:33 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

80-1798

Petitioner

Woelke & Romero Framing, Inc.

Respondent

National Labor Relations Board

Consolidation

No. 80-1808

No. 81-91

Heard By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Decided By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Opinion

456 U.S. 645 (1982)

Argued

Wednesday, March 3, 1982

Decided

Monday, May 24, 1982

Advocates

Norton J. Come (on behalf of Respondent National Labor Relations Board)

John W. Prager, Jr. (on behalf of Petitioner in 80-1798)

Lewis K. Scott (on behalf of Petitioners in 80-1808 and 81-91)

Laurence E. Gold (on behalf of Respondent unions)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for NLRB, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Longshoremen v. Allied International, Inc.

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:30:24 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

80-1663

Petitioner

Longshoremen

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Allied International, Inc.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Decided By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Opinion

456 U.S. 212 (1982)

Argued

Monday, January 18, 1982

Decided

Tuesday, April 20, 1982

Advocates

Duane R. Batista (on behalf of the Respondent)

Ernest L. Mathews, Jr. (on behalf of the Petitioners)

Lawrence G. Wallace (as amicus curiae)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Allied International, Inc., 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Mullins

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:32:29 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

80-1345

Petitioner

Kaiser Steel Corp.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Mullins

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Decided By

Burger Court (1981-1986)

Opinion

455 U.S. 72 (1982)

Argued

Tuesday, November 10, 1981

Decided

Wednesday, January 13, 1982

Advocates

Barbara E. Etkind (amicus curiae)

A. Douglas Melamed (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Stephen J. Pollak (on behalf of the Respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Kaiser Steel Corp., 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

H. A. Artists & Associates v. Actors' Equity Assn.

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:28:52 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

80-348

Petitioner

H. A. Artists & Associates

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Actors' Equity Assn.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Decided By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Opinion

451 U.S. 704 (1981)

Argued

Monday, March 23, 1981

Decided

Tuesday, May 26, 1981

Advocates

Howard Breindel (on behalf of the Petitioners)

Laurence E. Gold (on behalf of the AFL-CIO as amicus curiae)

Jerome B. Lurie (on behalf of the Respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for H. A. Artists & Associates, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Norris-LaGuardia

None

NLRB v. Longshoremen

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:10:53 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

79-1082

Petitioner

National Labor Relations Board

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Longshoremen

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Decided By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Opinion

447 U.S. 490 (1980)

Argued

Tuesday, April 22, 1980

Decided

Friday, June 20, 1980

Advocates

Thomas W. Gleason (on behalf of Respondents)

Constantine P. Lambos (on behalf of Respondents)

J. Alan Lips (on behalf of Petitioner)

Lawrence G. Wallace (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Longshoremen, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Fmc v. Pacific Maritime Assn.

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:34:13 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

76-938

Petitioner

Fmc

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Pacific Maritime Assn.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Decided By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Opinion

435 U.S. 40 (1978)

Argued

Wednesday, December 7, 1977

Decided

Wednesday, March 1, 1978

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Fmc, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 46 U.S.C. 814

None

NLRB v. Pipefitters

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:10:22 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

75-777

Petitioner

National Labor Relations Board

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Pipefitters

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Decided By

Burger Court (1975-1981)

Opinion

429 U.S. 507 (1977)

Argued

Wednesday, October 6, 1976

Decided

Tuesday, February 22, 1977

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for NLRB, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Connell Co. v. Plumbers & Steamfitters

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:33:36 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

73-1256

Petitioner

Connell Co.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Plumbers & Steamfitters

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1972-1975)

Decided By

Burger Court (1972-1975)

Opinion

421 U.S. 616 (1975)

Argued

Tuesday, November 19, 1974

Decided

Monday, June 2, 1975

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Connell Co., 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Ramsey v. Mine Workers

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:19:01 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Ramsey

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Mine Workers

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1970-1971)

Decided By

Burger Court (1970-1971)

Opinion

401 U.S. 302 (1971)

Argued

Monday, December 7, 1970

Decided

Wednesday, February 24, 1971

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Ramsey, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Norris-LaGuardia

None

Federation Of Musicians v. Carroll

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:41:29 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

309

Petitioner

Federation Of Musicians

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Carroll

Respondent Type

Respondent

Consolidation

No. 310

Heard By

Warren Court (1967-1969)

Decided By

Warren Court (1967-1969)

Opinion

391 U.S. 99 (1968)

Argued

Monday, March 4, 1968

Decided

Monday, May 20, 1968

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Federation Of Musicians, 2 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Norris-LaGuardia

None

Houston Contractors Assn. v. NLRB

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:42:09 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

206

Petitioner

Houston Contractors Assn.

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

National Labor Relations Board

Respondent Type

Respondent

Consolidation

No. 413

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 664 (1967)

Argued

Thursday, January 19, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 17, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for NLRB, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision:

None

Woodwork Manufacturers v. NLRB

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:42:11 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

110

Petitioner

Woodwork Manufacturers

Respondent

National Labor Relations Board

Consolidation

No. 111

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

386 U.S. 612 (1967)

Argued

January 18-19, 1967

Decided

Monday, April 17, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for NLRB, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: National Labor Relations, as amended

None

Mine Workers v. Pennington

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:34:34 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Mine Workers

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Pennington

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1962-1965)

Decided By

Warren Court (1962-1965)

Opinion

381 U.S. 657 (1965)

Argued

Wednesday, January 27, 1965

Decided

Monday, June 7, 1965

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Mine Workers, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Sherman

None

Meat Cutters v. Jewel Tea

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:34:24 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

240

Petitioner

Meat Cutters

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Jewel Tea

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1962-1965)

Decided By

Warren Court (1962-1965)

Opinion

381 U.S. 676 (1965)

Argued

Wednesday, January 27, 1965

Decided

Monday, June 7, 1965

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Meat Cutters, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Sherman

None

Meat Drivers v. United States

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:38:33 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Appellee

United States

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

Meat Drivers

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1962-1965)

Decided By

Warren Court (1962-1965)

Opinion

371 U.S. 94 (1962)

Argued

Wednesday, October 10, 1962

Decided

Monday, November 19, 1962

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for United States, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Sherman

None