Cases by Issue - Citizenship

Ins v. Pangilinan

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:25:30 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

86-1992

Petitioner

Ins

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Pangilinan

Respondent Type

Respondent

Consolidation

No. 86-2019

Heard By

Rehnquist Court (1988-1990)

Decided By

Rehnquist Court (1988-1990)

Opinion

486 U.S. 875 (1988)

Argued

Wednesday, February 24, 1988

Decided

Friday, June 17, 1988

Advocates

Robert H. Klonoff (on behalf of the petitioner)

Donald L. Ungar (on behalf of the respondents)

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Ins, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended

None

Astrup v. Immigration Service

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:19:04 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

840

Petitioner

Astrup

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Immigration Service

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Burger Court (1970-1971)

Decided By

Burger Court (1970-1971)

Opinion

402 U.S. 509 (1971)

Argued

Tuesday, April 20, 1971

Decided

Monday, May 24, 1971

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 9 votes for Astrup, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Selective Service, Military Selective Service, or Universal Military Service and Training Acts

None

Berenyi v. Immigration Director

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:42:19 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Petitioner

Berenyi

Respondent

Immigration Director

Heard By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Decided By

Warren Court (1965-1967)

Opinion

385 U.S. 630 (1967)

Argued

December 5-6, 1966

Decided

Monday, January 23, 1967

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Immigration Director, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended

None

Montana v. Kennedy

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:38:02 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

198

Petitioner

Montana

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

Kennedy

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1958-1962)

Decided By

Warren Court (1958-1962)

Opinion

366 U.S. 308 (1961)

Argued

Wednesday, March 22, 1961

Decided

Monday, May 22, 1961

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 8 votes for Kennedy, 1 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 2 Stat. 155

None

Mackey v. Mendoza-Martinez

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:30:17 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

Appellee

Mendoza-Martinez

Petitioner Type

Appellee

Appellant

Mackey

Respondent Type

Appellant

Heard By

Warren Court (1958-1962)

Decided By

Warren Court (1958-1962)

Opinion

362 U.S. 384 (1960)

Argued

Tuesday, November 10, 1959

Decided

Monday, April 18, 1960

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for Mendoza-Martinez, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Immigration and Naturalization, Immigration, Nationality, or Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Acts, as amended

None

Tak Shan Fong v. United States

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 16:29:18 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

110

Petitioner

Tak Shan Fong

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

United States

Respondent Type

Respondent

Heard By

Warren Court (1958-1962)

Decided By

Warren Court (1958-1962)

Opinion

359 U.S. 102 (1959)

Argued

Tuesday, February 24, 1959

Decided

Monday, March 23, 1959

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 6 votes for United States, 3 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 8 U.S.C. 1440

None

Thompson v. I. N. S.

Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:37:38 +0000

Case Basics

Docket No.

496

Petitioner

Thompson

Petitioner Type

Petitioner

Respondent

I. N. S.

Respondent Type

Respondent

Decided By

Warren Court (1962-1965)

Opinion

375 U.S. 384 (1964)

Decided

Monday, January 6, 1964

Facts of the Case

None

Question

None

Conclusion

Decision: 5 votes for Thompson, 4 vote(s) against
Legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including Appellate Procedure (or relevant rules of a circuit court)

None