The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Wednesday, October 5, 1994
Decision: Tuesday, November 29, 1994
Issues: First Amendment, Obscenity, Federal

Advocates

Drew S. Days, III (Argued the cause for the United States)
Stanley Fleishman (Argued the cause for the respondents)

Facts of the Case

The Protection of Children Against Sexual Exploitation Act of 1977 prohibited the interstate transportation, shipping, receipt, distribution, or reproduction of visual materials containing children engaged in sexually explicit acts. Richard Gottesman, owner and manager of X-Citement Video, sold forty-nine tapes to undercover officers. Gottesman shipped the videos, containing pornographic acts by industry legend Traci Lords before she turned eighteen, to Hawaii. Although he claimed he did not know the tapes contained underage pornographic acts, Gottesman was arrested for violating the sexual exploitation act.

Question

Did the Act's use of the term "knowingly" violate the First Amendment's Free Speech clause by not mandating a showing that the alleged offender knew which materials contained under-age performances?

Conclusion

No. The Court relied on an awkward grammatical construction as it held that the term "knowingly" applied to the entire passage of the law. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice William Rehnquist stated that other interpretations failed to make sense since Congress obviously did not envision people accidentally mailing underage pornographic materials. All the law required was a showing that alleged violators intentionally distributed illegal pornography, regardless of whether they knew it depicted underage performances.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Full Opinion: First Amendment, Obscenity, Federal: 7 - 2
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Scalia
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Kennedy
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Souter
Voted with the minority, joined Scalia's dissent
Thomas
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Breyer

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. X-Citement Video, 513 U.S. 64 (1994),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_723/>
(last visited ).