The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Monday, March 18, 1996
Decision: Monday, June 10, 1996
Issues: Federal Taxation

Advocates

James R. Atwood (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Jeffrey P. Minear (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) paid a tax on insurance premiums it paid to foreign insurers to insure exports from the U.S. to foreign countries. IBM sought a refund on the tax and filed suit in the Court of Federal Claims when its refund claim was denied by the IRS. IBM contended the tax violated the Export Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which states that "[n]o Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State." The court agreed. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Question

May the federal government impose a tax on premiums that U.S. businesses pay foreign insurers for risks that could arise in this country?

Conclusion

No. In a 6-2 decision, announced by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court ruled the tax did violate the Export Clause and was therefore unconstitutional.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Full Opinion: Federal Taxation: 6 - 2
Voted with the majority, joined Thomas' opinion
Rehnquist
Did not participate
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined Thomas' opinion
O'Connor
Voted with the majority, joined Thomas' opinion
Scalia
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Kennedy
Voted with the majority, joined Thomas' opinion
Souter
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Kennedy's dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority, joined Thomas' opinion
Breyer

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. International Business Machines Corp., 517 U.S. 843 (1996),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_95_591/>
(last visited ).