The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Monday, March 25, 1996
Decision: Monday, May 13, 1996
Issues: Federal Taxation, Priority of Federal Fiscal Claims

Advocates

Kent L. Jones (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Raymond J. Pikna (Argued the cause for the respondent)

Facts of the Case

The IRS filed claims in Bankruptcy Court for taxes, interest, and penalties that accrued when Thomas R. Noland, the trustee of the in-debt First Truck Lines, Inc., sought relief under federal Bankruptcy Code. The Bankruptcy Court held that the claims for taxes and interest were the first priority in the case. Consequently, the court subordinated the penalties, to be adjudicated following the taxes and interest, because the penalties were not financial losses for the IRS. The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision.

Question

May a bankruptcy court subordinate government attempts to collect tax penalties?

Conclusion

No. In a unanimous decision, announced by Justice David H. Souter, the Court ruled that giving tax-penalty claims a lower priority than other claims contradicts Congress_ scheme of priorities regarding federal bankruptcy law.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for United States, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Act or Rules, or Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote the majority opinion
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice David H. Souter

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. Noland, 517 U.S. 535 (1996),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_95_323/>
(last visited ).