|
Abstract
| Argument: |
Tuesday, October 5, 1976
|
| Decision: |
Monday, December 20, 1976 |
| Issues: |
Civil Rights, Sex Discrimination |
| Categories: |
equal protection, fourteenth amendment, justiciability, standing |
|
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
An Oklahoma law prohibited the sale of "nonintoxicating" 3.2 percent beer to males under the age of 21 and to females under the age of 18. Curtis Craig, a male then between the ages of 18 and 21, and a licensed vendor challenged the law as discriminatory.
Question
Did an Oklahoma statute violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause by establishing different drinking ages for men and women?
Conclusion
In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that the statute made unconstitutional gender classifications. The Court held that the statistics relied on by the state of Oklahoma were insufficient to show a substantial relationship between the law and the maintenance of traffic safety. Generalities about the drinking habits of aggregate groups did not suffice. The Court also found that the Twenty-first Amendment did not alter the application of the Equal Protection Clause in the case.