The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 4, 1998
Decision: Wednesday, February 24, 1999
Issues: Civil Rights, Deportation

Advocates

David D. Cole (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Malcolm L. Stewart (Argued the cause for the petitioners)

Facts of the Case

Bashar Amer, Aiad Barakat, Julie Mungai, Amjad Obeid, Ayman Obeid, Naim Sharif, Khader Hamide, and Michel Shehadeh, members of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), were marked for deportation by the Immigration and Naturalization Service. The PFLP is characterized by the government as an international terrorist and communist organization. The resident aliens filed suit alleging the Attorney General and other federal parties had targeted them for deportation because of their affiliation with a politically unpopular group, in violation of their First and Fifth Amendment rights. Initially, the District Court enjoined the deportation proceedings. During the case, Congress passed the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA). The IIRIRA restricts judicial review of the Attorney General's "decision or action" to "commence proceedings, adjudicate cases, or execute removal orders against any alien under this Act." Reno then filed motions arguing that the IIRIRA deprived the courts of jurisdiction over the aliens' selective-enforcement claim. The District Court denied the motion. The Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's decision on the merits.

Question

Does the IIRIRA deprive federal courts of jurisdiction over aliens' suits alleging that actions of the Attorney General are selectively enforced?

Conclusion

Yes. In an 8-1 decision, announced by Justice Antonin Scalia, the Court ruled that the IIRIRA deprives federal courts of jurisdiction over the selective-enforcement claim. Justice Scalia wrote, "[a]s a general matter -- and assuredly in the context of claims such as those put forward in the present case -- an alien unlawfully in this country has no constitutional right to assert selective enforcement as a defense against his deportation."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 8 votes for Reno, 1 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 8 U.S.C. 1252
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a special concurrence
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Wrote a dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Wrote a special concurrence
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority, joined Ginsburg's concurrence
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471 (1999),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1998/1998_97_1252/>
(last visited ).