The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 2, 1988
Decision: Wednesday, February 22, 1989
Issues: Civil Rights, Juveniles
Categories: children

Advocates

Donald B. Ayer (Argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance)
Mark J. Mingo (Argued the cause for the respondents)
Donald J. Sullivan (Argued the cause for the petitioners)

Facts of the Case

In 1984, four-year-old Joshua DeShaney became comatose and then profoundly retarded due to traumatic head injuries inflicted by his father who physically beat him over a long period of time. The Winnebago County Department of Social Services took various steps to protect the child after receiving numerous complaints of the abuse; however, the Department did not act to remove Joshua from his father's custody. Joshua DeShaney's mother subsequently sued the Winnebago County Department of Social Services, alleging that the Department had deprived the child of his "liberty interest in bodily integrity, in violation of his rights under the substantive component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, by failing to intervene to protect him against his father's violence."

Question

Does a state's failure to protect an individual against private violence constitute a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

No. The Due Process Clause does not impose a special duty on the State to provide services to the public for protection against private actors if the State did not create those harms. "The Clause is phrased as a limitation on the State's power to act, not as a guarantee of certain minimal levels of safety and security; while it forbids the State itself to deprive individuals of life, liberty, and property without due process of law, its language cannot fairly be read to impose an affirmative obligation on the State to ensure that those interests do not come to harm through other means."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for Winnebago County, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Due Process
Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the minority, joined Brennan's dissent
Marshall
Wrote a dissent, joined Brennan's dissent
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Full Opinion by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, DeShaney v. Winnebago County, 489 U.S. 189 (1989),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1988/1988_87_154/>
(last visited ).