The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Monday, November 18, 1946
Decision: Monday, January 13, 1947
Categories: capital punishment, criminal, cruel and unusual punishment, double jeopardy, eighth amendment

Advocates

Michael E. Culligan (Argued the cause for the respondents)
L. O. Pecot (Argued the cause for the respondents)
James Skelly Wright (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Willie Francis, a 16-year-old black youth, was convicted of murder in Louisiana and sentenced to death by electrocution. On the appointed day, Francis was strapped in the chair and the executioner threw the switch. Electric current passed through Francis's body but it was insufficient to kill him. The malfunction required a repair of the chair. In the meantime Francis sought to prevent the second execution attempt.

Question

Does the second attempted execution deny Francis due process of law because of double jeopardy guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment and because of cruel and unusual punishment of the Eighth Amendment?

Conclusion

No and no. The equipment failure does not bring due process into play. This was not the wanton infliction of unnecessary pain in the execution of the death sentence. And the cruelty of the Eighth Amendment refers to cruelty in method, not that cruelty which is part of the actual suffering accompanying a lawful sentence of death.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 - 4
Voted with the majority, joined Reed's judgment of the court
Vinson
Voted with the majority, joined Reed's judgment of the court
Black
Voted with the majority, authored a judgment of the court
Reed
Voted with the majority, authored a special concurrence
Frankfurter
Voted with the minority, joined Burton's dissent
Douglas
Voted with the minority, joined Burton's dissent
Murphy
Voted with the majority, joined Reed's judgment of the court
Jackson
Voted with the minority, joined Burton's dissent
Rutledge
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Burton

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Louisiana v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459 (1947),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1940-1949/1946/1946_142/>
(last visited ).