The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Thursday, January 31, 1952
Decision: Monday, April 28, 1952
Categories: education, establishment of religion, first amendment, freedom of religion

Advocates

Wendell P. Brown (Argued the cause for the Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, appellee)
Michael A. Castaldi (Argued the cause for the Board of Education of the City of New York, appellee)
Kenneth W. Greenawalt (Argued the cause for appellants)
Charles H. Tuttle (Argued the cause for the Greater New York Coordinating Committee on Released Time of Jews, Protestants and Roman Catholics, appellee)

Facts of the Case

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court's decision in McCollum v. Board of Education, New York City began a program in which students in public schools could be dismissed from classroom activities for certain periods to participate in religious instruction elsewhere. In McCollum, the Court disallowed an Illinois program in which representatives of religious groups came to public schools and taught classes during the school day. New York's "released time" program was upheld by the New York Court of Appeals.

Question

Did the New York program violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment?

Conclusion

In a 6-to-3 decision, the Court held that the "released time" program neither constituted the establishment of religion nor interfered with the free exercise of religion. The Court noted that public facilities were not being used for the purpose of religious instruction and that "no student was forced to go to the religious classroom." Writing for the majority, Justice Douglas argued that there was "no constitutional requirement which makes it necessary for government to be hostile to religion and to throw its weight against efforts to widen the effective scope of religious influence."

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 - 3
Voted with the majority, joined Douglas' opinion
Vinson
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Black
Voted with the majority, joined Douglas' opinion
Reed
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Frankfurter
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
Douglas
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Jackson
Voted with the majority, joined Douglas' opinion
Burton
Voted with the majority, joined Douglas' opinion
Clark
Voted with the majority, joined Douglas' opinion
Minton

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Zorach v. Clauson, 343 U.S. 306 (1952),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1951/1951_431/>
(last visited ).