|
Abstract
| Argument: |
Tuesday, December 4, 1984
|
| Decision: |
Tuesday, June 4, 1985 |
| Issues: |
First Amendment, Parochiaid |
| Categories: |
education, establishment of religion, first amendment, freedom of religion |
|
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
An Alabama law authorized teachers to conduct regular religious prayer services and activities in school classrooms during the school day. Three of Jaffree's children attended public schools in Mobile.
Question
Did Alabama law violate the First Amendment's Establishment Clause?
Conclusion
Yes. The Court determined the constitutionality of Alabama's prayer and meditation statute by applying the secular purpose test, which asked if the state's actual purpose was to endorse or disapprove of religion. The Court held that Alabama's passage of the prayer and meditation statute was not only a deviation from the state's duty to maintain absolute neutrality toward religion, but was an affirmative endorsement of religion. As such, the statute clearly lacked any secular purpose as it sought to establish religion in public schools, thereby violating the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.