|
Abstract
| Argument: |
Monday, March 1, 1982
|
| Decision: |
Tuesday, June 1, 1982 |
| Issues: |
Criminal Procedure, Search and Seizure, Vehicles |
| Categories: |
fourth amendment, precedent, searches and seizures |
|
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
Acting on a tip that Ross was selling drugs from his car in the District of Columbia, police officers pulled Ross over, opened his trunk, and discovered a bag of heroin. After returning to the station, another search uncovered $3200 in cash. Officers acted without a warrant in each search.
Question
Did the police violate the Fourth Amendment?
Conclusion
The Court held that since the search was done with probable cause and extended into the realm (Ross's car) of which a magistrate issuing a warrant would have approved, the officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment. Justice Stevens defended the search of the vehicle's trunk, arguing that if probable cause justifies a vehicle search, then every part of the vehicle is open to inspection.