The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, October 9, 1973
Decision: Tuesday, December 11, 1973
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Search and Seizure, Vehicles

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

A police officer pulled over and arresting Robinson for operating an automobile without a valid permit. The officer then frisked Robinson and discovered a crumpled cigarette package containing fourteen vials of heroin in his pocket.

Question

Did the officer's search violate the Fourth Amendment?

Conclusion

The Court upheld the search. Distinguishing between searches done to discover concealed weapons and those conducted coextensive with an arrest, Justice Rehnquist argued since the officer did not conduct the search in an abusive or extreme manner, and because he acted consistent with the authority vested in a police officer when making an arrest, his actions were legitimate.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for United States, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Amendment 4: Fourth Amendment
Voted with the majority
Burger
Voted with the minority, joined Marshall's dissent
Douglas
Voted with the minority, joined Marshall's dissent
Brennan
Voted with the majority
Stewart
Voted with the majority
White
Wrote a dissent
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote a regular concurrence
Powell
Wrote the majority opinion
Rehnquist
Full Opinion by Justice William H. Rehnquist

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States v. Robinson, 414 U.S. 218 (1973),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1973/1973_72_936/>
(last visited ).