The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Wednesday, November 10, 1976
Decision: Wednesday, April 27, 1977
Issues: Economic Activity, State Regulation of Business
Categories: commerce clause, federalism, states

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

New York and New Jersey had established a Port Authority to enhance water-bound business between the two states. In 1974, the states repealed a 1962 bond agreement which limited the Authority to administer commercial and passenger railroad subsidies.

Question

In repealing the 1962 agreement, did the states violate the Contract Clause?

Conclusion

The repeal violated the Constitution. Justice Blackmun argued that the states could have implemented a less drastic solution to encourage people to use commuter train services in lieu of driving their cars. (State leaders thought the increase in bridge fares that would occur with the agreement's repeal would cause this to occur.) Furthermore, since the need to facilitate mass transportation in the New York metropolitan area had been a concern long before 1962, the states could not justify their action as a response to unforeseen circumstances.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 4 votes for United States Trust Co. of NY, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 10, Paragraph 1: Contract Clause
Did not participate
Stewart
Did not participate
Powell
Wrote a regular concurrence
Burger
Wrote a dissent
Brennan
Voted with the minority, joined Brennan's dissent
White
Voted with the minority, joined Brennan's dissent
Marshall
Wrote the majority opinion
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Full Opinion by Justice Harry A. Blackmun

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, United States Trust Co. of NY v. New Jersey, 431 U.S. 1 (1977),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_1687/>
(last visited ).