The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, March 29, 1983
Decision: Tuesday, June 28, 1983
Issues: Criminal Procedure, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Non-Death Penalty

Advocates

John J. Burnett (By appointment of the Court, argued the cause for the respondent)
Mark V. Meierhenry (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Helm was convicted of writing a check from a fictitious account, a crime carrying with it a five-year jail sentence. However, since this was his seventh felony conviction in South Dakota since 1964, he was sentenced to life imprisonment without parole under a state recidivist statute.

Question

Did the sentence violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Conclusion

Yes. Since all of Helm's prior offenses, including his current check-writing conviction, had been "relatively minor" and were not crimes against people, Justice Powell held that Helm had "received the penultimate sentence (South Dakota did not have the death penalty) for relatively minor criminal conduct." Powell concluded that Helm was treated more harshly than the state's most violent criminals.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 5 votes for Helm, 4 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Amendment 8: Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Wrote a dissent
Burger
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the minority, joined Burger's dissent
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Wrote the majority opinion
Powell
Voted with the minority, joined Burger's dissent
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the minority, joined Burger's dissent
O'Connor
Full Opinion by Justice Lewis F. Powell, Jr.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 (1983),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1982/1982_82_492/>
(last visited ).