The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Saturday, June 26, 1971
Decision: Wednesday, June 30, 1971
Issues: First Amendment, Miscellaneous
Categories: first amendment, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, international relations, national security, presidency

Advocates

Alexander M. Bickel (Argued the cause for the petitioner)
Erwin N. Griswold (Argued the cause for the United States)
William R. Glendon (Argued the case for the respondents)

Facts of the Case

In what became known as the "Pentagon Papers Case," the Nixon Administration attempted to prevent the New York Times and Washington Post from publishing materials belonging to a classified Defense Department study regarding the history of United States activities in Vietnam. The President argued that prior restraint was necessary to protect national security. This case was decided together with United States v. Washington Post Co.

Question

Did the Nixon administration's efforts to prevent the publication of what it termed "classified information" violate the First Amendment?

Conclusion

Yes. In its per curiam opinion the Court held that the government did not overcome the "heavy presumption against" prior restraint of the press in this case. Justices Black and Douglas argued that the vague word "security" should not be used "to abrogate the fundamental law embodied in the First Amendment." Justice Brennan reasoned that since publication would not cause an inevitable, direct, and immediate event imperiling the safety of American forces, prior restraint was unjustified.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for New York Times, 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Amendment 1: Speech, Press, and Assembly
Wrote a dissent, joined Harlan's dissent
Burger
Wrote a regular concurrence, joined Douglas' concurrence
Black
Wrote a regular concurrence, joined Black's concurrence
Douglas
Wrote a dissent
Harlan
Wrote a regular concurrence
Brennan
Wrote a regular concurrence, joined White's concurrence
Stewart
Wrote a regular concurrence, joined Stewart's concurrence
White
Wrote a regular concurrence
Marshall
Wrote a dissent, joined Harlan's dissent
Blackmun
Per Curiam with Argument

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, New York Times v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1970/1970_1873/>
(last visited ).