The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, March 29, 1988
Decision: Tuesday, May 31, 1988
Issues: Economic Activity, State Tax

Advocates

Richard C. Farrin (on behalf of the Appellees)
Herman Schwartz (on behalf of the Appellant)

Facts of the Case

An Indiana law gave a tax credit against the Ohio motor vehicle fuel sales tax for each gallon of ethanol sold by fuel dealers, provided that the ethanol was produced in Ohio or in a state that grants similar tax advantages as the Ohio scheme.

Question

Did the law discriminate against interstate commerce and violate the Commerce Clause?

Conclusion

Yes. The unanimous Court held that the law's primary purpose was to confer favorable tax treatment on Ohio-produced ethanol which imposed "an economic disadvantage upon out-of-state sellers." Ohio was unable to advance a legitimate local purpose for the law

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for New Energy Company of Indiana, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Article 1, Section 8, Paragraph 3: Interstate Commerce Clause
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Brennan
Voted with the majority
White
Voted with the majority
Marshall
Voted with the majority
Blackmun
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Wrote the majority opinion
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Full Opinion by Justice Antonin Scalia

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, New Energy Company of Indiana v. Limbach, 486 U.S. 269 (1988),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_87_654/>
(last visited ).