The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Friday, February 23, 1923
Decision: Monday, June 4, 1923
Categories: children, criminal, education, privacy

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

Nebraska, along with other states, prohibited the teaching of modern foreign languages to grade school children. Meyer, who taught German in a Lutheran school, was convicted under this law.

Question

Does the Nebraska statute violate the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process clause?

Conclusion

Yes, the Nebraska law is unconstitutional. Nebraska violated the liberty protected by due process of the Fourteenth Amendment. Liberty means more than freedom from bodily restraint. State regulation of liberty must be reasonably related to a proper state objective. The legislature's view of reasonableness was subject to supervision by the courts. The legislative purpose of the law was to promote assimilation and civic development. But these purposes were not adequate to justify interfering with Meyer's liberty to teach or the liberty of parents to employ him during a "time of peace and domestic tranquillity."

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1922/1922_325/>
(last visited ).