The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Tuesday, March 25, 1986
Decision: Thursday, June 19, 1986
Issues: Civil Rights, Sex Discrimination in Employment
Categories: employment, gender, sex discrimination

Advocates

Patricia J. Barry (Argued the cause for the respondent)
F. Robert Troll, Jr. (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

After being dismissed from her job at a Meritor Savings Bank, Mechelle Vinson sued Sidney Taylor, the Vice President of the bank. Vinson charged that she had constantly been subjected to sexual harassment by Taylor over her four years at the bank. She argued such harassment created a "hostile working environment" and was covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vinson sought injunctive relief along with compensatory and punitive damages against Taylor and the bank.

Question

Did the Civil Rights Act prohibit the creation of a "hostile environment" or was it limited to tangible economic discrimination in the workplace?

Conclusion

The Court held that the language of Title VII was "not limited to 'economic' or 'tangible' discrimination," finding that Congress intended "'to strike at the entire spectrum of disparate treatment of men and women' in employment. . ." The Court noted that guidelines issued by the EEOC specified that sexual harassment leading to noneconomic injury was a form of sex discrimination prohibited by Title VII. The Court recognized that plaintiffs could establish violations of the Act "by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment." The Court declined to rule on the degree to which businesses could be liable for the conduct of specific employees.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Full Opinion: Civil Rights, Sex Discrimination in Employment: 9 - 0
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Burger
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's special concurrence
Brennan
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
White
Voted with the majority, authored a special concurrence
Marshall
Voted with the majority, joined Marshall's special concurrence
Blackmun
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
Powell
Voted with the majority, authored an opinion
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority, authored a concurrence, joined Marshall's special concurrence
Stevens
Voted with the majority, joined Rehnquist's opinion
O'Connor

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1985/1985_84_1979/>
(last visited ).