The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Thursday, October 20, 1910
Decision: Tuesday, January 3, 1911

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

Bailey contracted to work on a farm for a year at $12 a month. He quit after a month and did not return $15 advanced to him. Under Alabama law, Bailey's act was criminal. He was convicted and sentenced to 136 days of hard labor under the Alabama peonage law.

Question

Did the Alabama law violate the Thirteenth Amendment?

Conclusion

The Court, through Hughes, argued that the law was a restriction on personal rights. Judged by its effect and not by its pretense, the law violated the Thirteenth Amendment. Involuntary servitude meant more than slavery.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Bailey v. Alabama, 219 U.S. 219 (1911),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1901-1939/1910/1910_300/>
(last visited ).