The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Argument: Tuesday, November 12, 1991
Decision: Monday, January 27, 1992
Issues: Unions, Distribution of Union Literature

Advocates

Michael R. Dreeben (Argued the cause for the respondent)
Robert P. Joy (Argued the cause for the petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Lechmere owned and operated a large retail store in a shopping plaza. Nonemployee union organizers campaigned to organize the store employees by entering the company's parking lot and placing handbills on car windshields. Lechmere prohibited solicitation and literature distribution on its property. The union organizers persisted in their leafleting campaign despite continued objections from Lechmere. The union filed an unfair labor practice charge against Lechmere. An NLRB judge ruled in the union's favor.

Question

May nonemployee union organizers trespass on private property to solicit union support?

Conclusion

No, reasoned Justice Thomas in his first Court opinion, except in situations where inaccessibility makes communication through normal channels ineffective. There were alternatives short of trespass, such as signs, mailings, and newspaper ads. (Thomas's defense of private property rights may offer a clue to his budding jurisprudence.)

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 votes for Lechmere Inc., 3 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: National Labor Relations, as amended
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Wrote a dissent
White
Voted with the minority, joined White's dissent
Blackmun
Wrote a dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Lechmere Inc. v. NLRB, 502 U.S. 527 (1992),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_970/>
(last visited ).