The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Granted: Monday, February 23, 2004
Argument: Monday, November 1, 2004
Decision: Tuesday, February 22, 2005
Issues: Economic Activity, Election of Remedies

Advocates

Lisa S. Blatt (argued the cause for Petitioner, on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae)
Frederick E. Connelly, Jr. (argued the cause for Respondent)
David B. Kaplan (argued the cause for Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Willard Stewart was injured while working on a dredge (a machine for underwater digging) for Dutra, a dredging company. Stewart alleged Dutra was negligent and sued the company in federal district court under the Jones Act. The district court ruled a dredge is not a "vessel in navigation" as defined by the Jones Act and therefore Stewart could not sue under the act. The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

Question

Is a dredge a "vessel" under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA)?

Conclusion

Yes. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court held that the Revised Statutes of 1873 specified that in any act passed after 1871, "vessel" included any watercraft capable of transportation. The requirement that a worker be on a vessel "in navigation," required by the LHWCA, simply meant that the vessel be capable of transportation. This included dredges which, both then and now, transported equipment and a crew over water.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 8 votes for Stewart, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: Longshoremen and Harbor Workers' Compensation
Did not participate
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Wrote the majority opinion
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Full Opinion by Justice Clarence Thomas

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Stewart v. Dutra Construction Company, 543 U.S. 481 (2005),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_814/>
(last visited ).