The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Tuesday, January 22, 1884
Decision: Monday, March 3, 1884
Categories: criminal, criminal procedure, incorporation, trial by jury

Advocates

Not available

Facts of the Case

The State of California tried and convicted Hurtado on an information for murder. An information is a written set of accusations made by a prosecutor. Hurtado maintained that California denied him an indictment by a grand jury. A grand jury indictment is based on majority vote of the grand jurors on presentation by the prosecutor.

Question

Does a state criminal proceeding based on an information rather than a grand jury indictment violate the 14th Amendment's due process clause?

Conclusion

No, this was not a violation of due process. Any legal proceeding that protects liberty and justice is due process. The majority opinion, authored by Matthews, reasoned that the Constitution cannot be locked into static conceptions bound by time and place. The Court also took the position that nothing in the Constitution is superfluous. Since the Fifth Amendment contains both a guarantee of grand jury proceedings and a guarantee of due process, the latter cannot embrace the former.

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1851-1900/1883/1883_0/>
(last visited ).