The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Wednesday, March 4, 1998
Decision: Thursday, June 25, 1998
Issues: Due Process, Takings Clause

Advocates

Peter Buscemi (on behalf of the Respondents UMWA)
Edwin S. Kneedler (supporting the Federal Respondents)
John T. Montgomery (on behalf of the Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

Currently unknown.

Question

Currently unknown.

Conclusion

Currently unknown.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Judgment of the Court: Due Process, Takings Clause: 5 - 4
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's judgment of the court
Rehnquist
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Stevens
Voted with the majority, authored a judgment of the court
O'Connor
Voted with the majority, joined O'Connor's judgment of the court
Scalia
Voted with the majority, authored a special concurrence
Kennedy
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Souter
Voted with the majority, authored a concurrence
Thomas
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, joined Breyer's dissent
Ginsburg
Voted with the minority, joined Stevens' dissent, authored a dissent
Breyer

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Eastern Enterprises v. Apfel, 524 U.S. 498 (1998),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1997/1997_97_42/>
(last visited ).