The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Oral Argument: Friday, December 1, 1950
Decision: Monday, June 4, 1951
Categories: criminal, first amendment, freedom of speech, national security, sedition

Advocates

George W. Crockett, Jr. (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Abraham J. Isserman (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Philip H. Perlman (Argued the cause for the United States)
Harry Sacher (Argued the cause for the petitioners)
Irving S. Shapiro (Argued the cause for the United States)

Facts of the Case

In 1948, the leaders of the Communist Part of America were arrested and charged with violating provisions of the Smith Act. The Act made it unlawful to knowingly conspire to teach and advocate the overthrow or destruction of the United States government. Party leaders were found guilty and lower courts upheld the conviction.

Question

Did the Smith Act's restrictions on speech violate the First Amendment?

Conclusion

In a 6-to-2 decision, the Court upheld the convictions of the Communist Party leaders and found that the Smith Act did not "inherently" violate the First Amendment. In the plurality opinion, the Court held that there was a distinction between the mere teaching of communist philosophies and active advocacy of those ideas. Such advocacy created a "clear and present danger" that threatened the government. Given the gravity of the consequences of an attempted putsch, the Court held that success or probability of success was not necessary to justify restrictions on the freedom of speech.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Seniority)

Sort by Ideology
(More information here)
Decision: 6 - 2
Voted with the majority, authored a judgment of the court
Vinson
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Black
Voted with the majority, joined Vinson's judgment of the court
Reed
Voted with the majority, authored a special concurrence
Frankfurter
Voted with the minority, authored a dissent
Douglas
Voted with the majority, authored a special concurrence
Jackson
Voted with the majority, joined Vinson's judgment of the court
Burton
Did not participate
Clark
Voted with the majority, joined Vinson's judgment of the court
Minton

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1950/1950_336/>
(last visited ).