<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Unions Issues - Bargaining Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/unions/bargaining/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>American Hospital Assn v. NLRB</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_90_97/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. NLRB</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_1267/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Central State Univ. v. AAUP</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Does Ohio statutory exemption of state university faculties' instructional workload standards from collective bargaining violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No. In an 8-1 per curiam opinion, the Court held that "the Ohio Supreme Court's holding cannot be reconciled with the requirements of the Equal Protection Clause." "One of [section 3345.45's] objectives was to increase the time spent by faculty in the classroom; the imposition of a faculty workload policy not subject to collective bargaining was an entirely rational step to accomplish this objective," stated the opinion. "Under our precedent," the court concluded "this is sufficient to sustain the exclusion of university professors from the otherwise general collective-bargaining scheme for public employees." Justice John Paul Stevens dissented.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1998/1998_98_1071/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service v. NLRB</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_931/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_32/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Fall River Dyeing &amp; Finishing Corp. v. NLRB</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1208/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_14/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>FLRA v. Aberdeen Proving Ground</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_86_1715/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Fort Stewart Schools v. FLRA</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_89_65/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>IRS v. FLRA</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_2123/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_53/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. Fant Milling Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_482/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. General Motors</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_404/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. Insurance Agents</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1959/1959_15/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. Katz</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_222/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1956/1956_4/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. Metropolitan Ins. Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_98/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1955/1955_486/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Linden Lumber Division v. NLRB</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_1231/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NFFE, Local 139 v. Department of the Interior</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Can federal agencies be required to bargain with federal employees' unions over issues that arise during the duration of a contract?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yes. In a 5-4 decision, announced by Justice Stephen G. Breyer, the Court ruled that the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute gave the Federal Labor Relations Authority power to determine whether parties must engage in midterm bargaining. Justice Breyer wrote, "Congress delegated to the authority the power to determine -- within appropriate legal bounds...whether, when, where and what sort of midterm bargaining is required."&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1998/1998_97_1184/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Acme Industrial Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_52/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1416/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Bell Aerospace Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1973/1973_72_1598/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Bildisco &amp; Bildisco</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_818/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Burns Security Services</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_71_123/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Catholic Bishop Of Chicago</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1978/1978_77_752/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1685/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1968/1968_573/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Hendricks Cty. Rural Electric Corp.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_885/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. United Insurance Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_178/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>NLRB v. Yeshiva University</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_78_857/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Pittsburgh &amp; L. E. R. Co. v. Railway Executives</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1988/1988_87_1589/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Porter Co. v. NLRB</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_230/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Transportation Union v. Long Island R. Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_1925/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
