The Oyez Project: Unions Issues - Bargaining Arguments http://www.oyez.org/issues/unions/bargaining/ U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en-us http://www.oyez.org/images/oyezfeed.jpg U.S. Supreme Court Audio Recordings, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) American Hospital Assn v. NLRB - Oral Argument Mon, 25 Feb 1991 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 90-97_19910225-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_90_97/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. NLRB - Oral Argument Wed, 10 Nov 1976 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 75-1267_19761110-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_1267/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service v. NLRB - Oral Argument Tue, 13 Oct 1981 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 80-931_19811013-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_931/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. NLRB - Oral Argument Mon, 02 Mar 1987 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 85-1208_19870302-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1208/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist FLRA v. Aberdeen Proving Ground - Oral Argument Tue, 23 Feb 1988 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 86-1715_19880223-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1987/1987_86_1715/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist Fort Stewart Schools v. FLRA - Oral Argument Wed, 10 Jan 1990 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 89-65_19900110-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_89_65/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist IRS v. FLRA - Oral Argument Mon, 08 Jan 1990 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 88-2123_19900108-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_2123/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist NFFE, Local 139 v. Department of the Interior - Oral Argument Mon, 09 Nov 1998 12:00:00 -0500 <p>The National Federation of Federal Employees, a federal employees' union, proposed to include a provision obligating the Interior Department to negotiate midterm matters not in the original contract between the union and the Agency. The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, that created the Federal Labor Relations Authority, requires federal agencies and their employees' unions to negotiate in good faith to arrive at a collective bargaining agreement. Initially, the Authority held that the good-faith bargaining clause did not extend to union-initiated proposals during the term of the basic contract. The Court of Appeals did not agree and, in turn, the Authority reversed its decision. The Interior Department refused the proposal on the ground that union-initiated midterm bargaining is inconsistent with the Statute. The Authority then ordered the Agency to comply with the bargaining.</p> <p>The National Federation of Federal Employees, a federal employees' union, proposed to include a provision obligating the Interior Department to negotiate midterm matters not in the original contract between the union and the Agency. The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, that created the Federal Labor Relations Authority, requires federal agencies and their employees' unions to negotiate in good faith to arrive at a collective bargaining agreement. Initially, the Authority held that the good-faith bargaining clause did not extend to union-initiated proposals during the term of the basic contract. The Court of Appeals did not agree and, in turn, the Authority reversed its decision. The Interior Department refused the proposal on the ground that union-initiated midterm bargaining is inconsistent with the Statute. The Authority then ordered the Agency to comply with the bargaining.</p><br/><br/><p>Can federal agencies be required to bargain with federal employees' unions over issues that arise during the duration of a contract?</p> 97-1184_19981109-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1998/1998_97_1184/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist NLRB v. Action Automotive, Inc. - Oral Argument Mon, 29 Oct 1984 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 83-1416_19841029-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_83_1416/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist NLRB v. Bildisco & Bildisco - Oral Argument Tue, 11 Oct 1983 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 82-818_19831011-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_818/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist NLRB v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc. - Oral Argument Mon, 04 Dec 1989 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 88-1685_19891204-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_1685/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist NLRB v. Hendricks Cty. Rural Electric Corp. - Oral Argument Mon, 05 Oct 1981 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 80-885_19811005-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_885/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist NLRB v. Hendricks Cty. Rural Electric Corp. - Opinion Announcement (No. 80-11) Wed, 02 Dec 1981 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 80-11_19811202-opinion http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_885/opinion_80-11/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co. v. Railway Executives - Oral Argument Wed, 29 Mar 1989 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 87-1589_19890329-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1988/1988_87_1589/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist Transportation Union v. Long Island R. Co. - Oral Argument Wed, 20 Jan 1982 12:00:00 -0500 No details yet. No details yet.<br/><br/>No details yet. 80-1925_19820120-argument http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_1925/argument/ supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist