<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Judicial Power Issues - Remand to Determine Basis of State Court Decision Arguments</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/judicial-power/remand/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <itunes:image>http://www.oyez.org/images/oyezfeed.jpg</itunes:image>
  <itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>U.S. Supreme Court Audio Recordings, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</itunes:subtitle>
    
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2000 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;The 2000 presidential election remained in limbo with the outcome dependent on the winner of the popular vote in Florida. Republican presidential candidate George W. Bush held a slim lead in the tally. Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore challenged the decision of Florida's Secretary of State, Katherine Harris, to certify the results of the presidential election on November 14, the deadline provided by Florida's election law. Gore also challenged Harris's decision to ignore the outcome of manual recounts his campaign had requested in four Florida counties, recounts available under another provision of Florida's election code. The Florida Supreme Court heard Gore's challenges and held that Harris could not certify the outcome until November 26. The Florida Supreme Court also held that Harris must include the results of manual recounts in the certified results. Governor Bush intervened. Harris and Bush appealed the Florida Supreme Court's decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Do post-election court decisions that limit legislators' or executive officials' discretion to certify election results violate the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution or 3 USC Section 5? Did the Florida Supreme Court's decision change the manner in which Florida's electoral votes were chosen, thereby violating Article II Section 1 Clause 2 of the US Constitution, which confers plenary power in federal election matters on state legislatures?&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
        <guid>00-836_20001201-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_00_836/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2000/2000_00_836/argument/00-836_20001201-argument.mp3" length="22138106" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Ohio v. Gallagher - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 1975 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>74-492_19751202-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_492/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_492/argument/74-492_19751202-argument.mp3" length="10720020" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
 </channel>
</rss>
