The Oyez Project: Interstate Relations Issues - Non-Real Property Dispute Between States Decisions http://www.oyez.org/issues/interstate-relations/nonreal-property/ U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en-us Arizona v. California <p>Are the Quechan Tribe and the United States claims for increased water rights for the Fort Yuma Reservation from the Colorado River precluded by the Supreme Court's prior decision in Arizona v. California and by a consent judgement?</p><p>No. In a opinion deliver by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the Court rejected both grounds for preclusion and remanded the case to a Special Master for a determination on the merits of the outstanding claims for additional water rights associated with disputed Fort Yuma Reservation boundary lands. "Those claims are the only ones that remain to be decided in Arizona v. California; their resolution will enable the Court to enter a final consolidated decree and bring this case to a close," wrote Justice Ginsburg for the Court.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_8_orig/ Arizona v. California <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1955/1955_10_orig/ California v. Washington <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_12_orig/ Colorado v. New Mexico <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_80_orig/ Colorado v. New Mexico <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1982/1982_80_orig/ Delaware v. New York <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_111_orig/ Idaho Ex Rel. Andrus v. Oregon <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_67_orig/ Idaho Ex Rel. Evans v. Oregon <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1982/1982_67_orig/ Idaho Ex Rel. Evans v. Oregon <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_67_orig/ Illinois v. Michigan <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_15_orig/ Kansas v. Colorado <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_105_orig/ Nebraska v. Wyoming <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_108_orig/ Nebraska v. Wyoming <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_108_orig/ Oklahoma v. New Mexico <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_109_orig/ Pennsylvania v. New York <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_40_orig/ Texas v. New Jersey <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1964/1964_13_orig/ Texas v. New Mexico <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1979/1979_65_orig/ Texas v. New Mexico <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_65_orig/