The Oyez Project: First Amendment Issues - Free Exercise of Religion Arguments

Bowen v. Roy - Oral Argument

Tue, 14 Jan 1986 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Braunfeld v. Brown - Oral Argument

Thu, 08 Dec 1960 12:00:00 -0500

Abraham Braunfeld owned a retail clothing and home furnishing store in Philadelphia. As an Orthodox Jew, he was prohibited by his faith from working on Saturday, the Sabbath. The Pennsylvania blue law only allowed certain stores to remain open for business on Sundays. Braunfeld's store was not one of those types allowed to be open. He challenged the law as a violation of the religious liberty clauses because he needed to be open six days a week for economic reasons and was prohibited from doing so by a tenet of his faith and the blue law.

Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah - Oral Argument

Wed, 04 Nov 1992 12:00:00 -0500

The Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye practiced the Afro-Caribbean-based religion of Santeria. Santeria used animal sacrifice as a form of worship in which an animal's carotid arteries would be cut and, except during healing and death rights, the animal would be eaten. Shortly after the announcement of the establishment of a Santeria church in Hialeah, Florida, the city council adopted several ordinances addressing religious sacrifice. The ordinances prohibited possession of animals for sacrifice or slaughter, with specific exemptions for state-licensed activities.

City of Boerne v. Flores - Oral Argument

Wed, 19 Feb 1997 12:00:00 -0500

The Archbishop of San Antonio sued local zoning authorities for violating his rights under the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), by denying him a permit to expand his church in Boerne, Texas. Boerne's zoning authorities argued that the Archbishop's church was located in a historic preservation district governed by an ordinance forbidding new construction, and that the RFRA was unconstitutional insofar as it sought to override this local preservation ordinance. On appeal from the Fifth Circuit's reversal of a District Court's finding against Archbishop Flores, the Court granted Boerne's request for certiorari.

Employment Division v. Smith - Oral Argument

Tue, 08 Dec 1987 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Employment Division v. Smith - Oral Argument

Mon, 06 Nov 1989 12:00:00 -0500

Two Native Americans who worked as counselors for a private drug rehabilitation organization, ingested peyote -- a powerful hallucinogen -- as part of their religious ceremonies as members of the Native American Church. As a result of this conduct, the rehabilitation organization fired the counselors. The counselors filed a claim for unemployment compensation. The government denied them benefits because the reason for their dismissal was considered work-related "misconduct." The counselors lost their battle in state court. But the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the Oregon Supreme Court's judgment against the disgruntled employees, and returned the case to the Oregon courts to determine whether or not sacramental use of illegal drugs violated Oregon's state drug laws (485 U.S. 660 (1988)). On remand, the Oregon Supreme Court concluded that while Oregon drug law prohibited the consumption of illegal drugs for sacramental religious uses, this prohibition violated the free exercise clause. The case returned to the U.S. Supreme Court in this new posture.

Frazee v. Illinois Employment Security Dept. - Oral Argument

Wed, 01 Mar 1989 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Goldman v. Weinberger - Oral Argument

Tue, 14 Jan 1986 12:00:00 -0500

Goldman was a commissioned officer in the United States Air Force, an Orthodox Jew, and an ordained rabbi. He was not allowed to wear his yarmulke while on duty and in Air Force uniform. An Air Force regulation mandated that indoors, headgear could not be worn "except by armed security police in the performance of their duties."

Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal - Oral Argument

Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:00:00 -0500

O Centro Espirita Benficiente Uniao do Vegetal (UDV), a religious organization, brought suit in federal court to prevent the government from interfering with UDV's use of hoasca, a substance used during religious ceremonies that contains a drug prohibited by the Controlled Substances Act. UDV argued that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which prohibits substantial imposition on religious practices in the absence of a compelling government interest, established their right to use hoasca.

The district court sided with UDV and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, finding that the government had not sufficiently proved the alleged health risks posed by hoasca and could not show a substantial risk that the drug would be abuse recreationally. In response to the Attorney General's argument that prohibiting the drug was required by an international treaty, the court ruled that the government had failed to "narrowly tailor" its prohibition of the drug.

Heffron v. Int. Society for Krishna Consciousness - Oral Argument

Mon, 20 Apr 1981 12:00:00 -0500

A Minnesota law allowed the Minnesota Agricultural Society to devise rules to regulate the annual state fair in St. Paul. Minnesota State Fair Rule 6.05 required organizations wishing to sell or distribute goods and written material to do so from an assigned location on the fairgrounds. In other words, walking vendors and solicitors were not allowed. The International Society for Krishna Consciousness challenged the rule, arguing that it restricted the ability of its followers to freely exercise their religious beliefs at the state fair.

Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n Of Fla. - Oral Argument

Wed, 10 Dec 1986 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Jensen, v. Quaring - Oral Argument

Mon, 07 Jan 1985 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches School District - Oral Argument

Wed, 24 Feb 1993 12:00:00 -0500

A New York law authorized schools to regulate the after-hour use of school property and facilities. The Center Moriches School District, acting under the statute, prohibited the use of its property by any religious group. The District refused repeated requests by Lamb's Chapel to use the school's facilities for an after-hours religious-oriented film series on family values and child rearing. The Chapel brought suit against the School District in federal court.

Lyng v. Northwest Indian CPA - Oral Argument

Mon, 30 Nov 1987 12:00:00 -0500

The United States Forest Service was considering building a paved roadway that would cut through the Chimney Rock area of the Six Rivers National Forest. It was also considering timber harvesting in the area. A study commissioned by the Forest Service reported that harvesting the Chimney Rock area would irreparably damage grounds that had historically been used by Native Americans to conduct religious rituals. After the Forest Service decided to construct a road, the Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association took action against Secretary of Agriculture Richard Lyng.

Mcdaniel v. Paty - Oral Argument

Mon, 05 Dec 1977 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

O'lone v. Estate Of Shabazz - Oral Argument

Tue, 24 Mar 1987 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Parker Seal Co. v. Cummins - Oral Argument

Tue, 12 Oct 1976 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Rosenberger v. University of Virginia - Oral Argument

Wed, 01 Mar 1995 12:00:00 -0500

Ronald W. Rosenberger, a University of Virginia student, asked the University for $5,800 from a student activities fund to subsidize the publishing costs of Wide Awake: A Christian Perspective at the University of Virginia. The University refused to provide funding for the publication solely because it "primarily promotes or manifests a particular belief in or about a diety or an ultimate reality," as prohibited by University guidelines.

Serbian Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich - Oral Argument

Mon, 22 Mar 1976 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Sherbert v. Verner - Oral Argument

Wed, 24 Apr 1963 12:00:00 -0500

Adeil Sherbert, a member of the Seventh-day Adventist Church, was fired from her job after she refused to work on Saturday, the Sabbath Day of her faith. The South Carolina Employment Security Commission denied her benefits, finding unacceptable her religious justification for refusing Saturday work.

Swaggart Ministries v. California Board of Equalization - Oral Argument

Tue, 31 Oct 1989 12:00:00 -0500

California law required retailers to pay a 6 percent sales tax on in-state sales of tangible personal property and residents to pay a 6 percent use tax on such property if purchased out of state. Jimmy Swaggart Ministries, incorporated in Louisiana, sold religious materials to California residents through several direct and mail-order "evangelistic crusades." After auditing his ministry, the California Board of Equalization ("Board") told Swaggart that under California law he had to register his ministry as a seller so the Board could collect the appropriate sales and use taxes. After paying the taxes, Swaggart petitioned the Board for a refund. When his petition was rejected, Swaggart challenged the Board in state court. Following two unfavorable rulings below, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Swaggart's petition for certiorari.

Thomas v. Review Bd., Ind. Empl. Sec. Di - Oral Argument

Tue, 07 Oct 1980 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

United States v. Lee - Oral Argument

Mon, 02 Nov 1981 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York v. Village of Stratton - Oral Argument

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 12:00:00 -0500

The Village of Stratton promulgated an ordinance that prohibits canvassers from entering private residential property to promote any cause without first obtaining a permit from the mayor's office. The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society of New York, Inc., a congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses that publish and distribute religious materials, brought an action for injunctive relief, alleging that the ordinance violates their First Amendment rights to the free exercise of religion, free speech, and freedom of the press. The District Court upheld most provisions of the ordinance as valid, content-neutral regulations. The Court of Appeals affirmed, concluding that the Village's interests in protecting its residents from fraud and its desire to prevent criminals from posing as canvassers in order to defraud its residents were sufficient bases on which to justify the regulation.

Wisconsin v. Yoder - Oral Argument

Wed, 08 Dec 1971 12:00:00 -0500

Jonas Yoder and Wallace Miller, both members of the Old Order Amish religion, and Adin Yutzy, a member of the Conservative Amish Mennonite Church, were prosecuted under a Wisconsin law that required all children to attend public schools until age 16. The three parents refused to send their children to such schools after the eighth grade, arguing that high school attendance was contrary to their religious beliefs.