The Oyez Project: Economic Activity Issues - Federal Transportation Regulation, Truck Decisions http://www.oyez.org/issues/economic-activity/truck/ U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org) en-us American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Service <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1969/1969_369/ American Trucking Assns. v. Frisco Co. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_15/ American Trucking Assns. v. U.S. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_6/ American Trucking Assns. v. U.S. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1959/1959_74/ Bowman Transp. v. Ark.-Best Freight System <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_1055/ County Of Marin v. United States <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_415/ East Texas Lines v. Frozen Food Exp. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1955/1955_162/ Hewitt-Robins v. Freight-Ways <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1962/1962_37/ I. C. C. v. J-T Transport Co. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_17/ Icc v. American Trucking Assns., Inc. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_1643/ Pierce County v. Guillen <p>Does the Hazard Elimination Program exceed Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause?</p><p>No. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Clarence Thomas, the Court held that both the original program and its subsequent amendments fall within Congress's Commerce Clause power to "'regulate the use of the channels of interstate commerce'" and "'to regulate and protect the instrumentalities of interstate commerce.'" The Court concluded that, because Congress could reasonably believe that adopting a measure eliminating an unforeseen side effect of the Program's information-gathering requirement would result in greater safety on the nation's roads, the legislation was aimed at improving safety in the channels of commerce and increasing protections for the instrumentalities of interstate commerce.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_01_1229/ Pub. Service Comm'n v. United States <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_15/ Red Ball Motor Freight v. Shannon <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_406/ Schaffer Transp. Co. v. U.S. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_20/ Security Services, Inc. v. Kmart Corp. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_93_284/ T. I. M. E. Inc. v. United States <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_68/ U.S. v. Contract Steel Carriers <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1955/1955_102/ United States v. A & P Trucking Co. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_32/ United States v. Drum <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1961/1961_23/ United States v. International Min'ls Corp. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1970/1970_557/ United States v. Montgomery, Inc. <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_66/ Willis Shaw Exp. v. United States <p>No details yet.</p> http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1963/1963_201/