<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Economic Activity Issues - Trademark Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/economic-activity/trademark/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Announcements, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <itunes:image>http://www.oyez.org/images/oyezfeed.jpg</itunes:image>
  <itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations"/>
  <itunes:author>The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</itunes:author>
    <itunes:subtitle>U.S. Supreme Court Audio Recordings, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</itunes:subtitle>
    
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>&lt;p&gt;Does the Lanham Act prevent the unaccredited copying of a work? If so, may a court double a profit award under the Act in order to deter future infringing conduct?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_428/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_428/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_02_428/opinion/02-428_20030602-opinion.mp3" length="1921274" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression, Inc. - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2004 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>&lt;p&gt;Did the classic fair use defense to trademark infringement require the party asserting the defense to demonstrate an absence or likelihood of confusion?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_409/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_409/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_409/opinion/03-409_20041208-opinion.mp3" length="1204121" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc. - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>&lt;p&gt;Does the Federal Trademark Dilution Act require objective proof of actual injury to the economic value of a famous mark for relief?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_01_1015/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_01_1015/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2002/2002_01_1015/opinion/01-1015_20030304-opinion.mp3" length="964822" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., Inc. - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 1995 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>No details yet.</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1577/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1577/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_93_1577/opinion/93-1577_19950328-opinion.mp3" length="651225" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc. - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 1992 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>No details yet.</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_971/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_971/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_971/opinion/91-971_19920626-opinion.mp3" length="176645" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Samara Bros. Inc. - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2000 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>&lt;p&gt;Is a product's design is distinctive, and therefore protectible, from "knockoffs" in an action for infringement of unregistered trade dress under section 43(a) of the Trademark Act of 1946?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_99_150/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_99_150/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_99_150/opinion/99-150_20000322-opinion.mp3" length="1530656" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
 </channel>
</rss>
