<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Economic Activity Issues - Mergers Arguments</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/economic-activity/mergers/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <itunes:image>http://www.oyez.org/images/oyezfeed.jpg</itunes:image>
  <itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>U.S. Supreme Court Audio Recordings, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</itunes:subtitle>
    
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>California v. American Stores Co. - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 1990 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>89-258_19900116-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_89_258/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_89_258/argument/89-258_19900116-argument.mp3" length="14141567" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Cargill, Inc. v. Monfort Of Colorado, Inc. - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 1986 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>85-473_19861006-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_473/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_473/argument/85-473_19861006-argument.mp3" length="14093686" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>E. I. Du Pont De Nemours &amp; Co. v. Collins - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 1977 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>75-1870_19770302-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_1870/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_75_1870/argument/75-1870_19770302-argument.mp3" length="21383346" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Federal Reserve System - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 1985 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;Certain bank holding companies located principally in either Connecticut or Massachusetts applied to the Federal Reserve Board (Board) to obtain approval for acquisitions of banks or bank holding companies (banks) in the other state. If a bank from one state seeks to acquire a bank, or substantially all of a bank's assets, from another state, the Douglas Amendment to the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA), 12 U.S.C. Section 1842(d), allows the Board to approve the acquisition only if it "is specifically authorized by the statute laws of the State in which such [acquired] bank is located." Massachusetts and Connecticut have substantially similar laws allowing out-of-state banks to buy in-state banks only if the out-of-state banks (1) have their principal place of business in another New England State, and (2) the other New England State accords equivalent reciprocal privileges. Certain banks from outside of New England opposed the acquisitions, but the Board found that the Douglas Amendment did not prevent their authorization, and approved them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Does the Douglas Amendment permit states to allow banks only from certain other states to buy in-state banks, and, if so, do such state laws violate the Commerce, the Compact, or the Equal Protection Clauses of the Constitution?&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
        <guid>84-363_19850415-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_363/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_363/argument/84-363_19850415-argument.mp3" length="13394766" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
 </channel>
</rss>
