<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Economic Activity Issues - Corruption</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/economic-activity/corruption/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Cases, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Barr v. Matteo</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_350/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Crandon v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1989/1989_88_931/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Dixson v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_5279/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Evans v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_6105/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Helstoski v. Meanor</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1978/1978_78_546/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Howard v. Lyons</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_57/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Mccormick v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_89_1918/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>McNally v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_86_234/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Pipefitters v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_74/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Steelworkers v. Sadlowski</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_81_395/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>U.S. v. Mississippi Valley Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_26/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Acme Process Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1966/1966_86/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Bornstein</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_712/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Brewster</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_45/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Helstoski</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1978/1978_78_349/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Johnson</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1965/1965_25/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Neifert-White Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1967/1967_267/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Shirey</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1958/1958_72/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Sun-Diamond Growers of California (Sun-Diamond), an agricultural trade association, was charged with violating a federal statute that prohibited the giving of anything valuable to a present, past, or future official "for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official." Sun-Diamond's indictment alleged that it gave illegal gratuities to former Agriculture Secretary Michael Espy while he was considering two matters in which Sun-Diamond had a vested interest. The indictment, however, did not claim a connection between the gratuities in question and either of the matters under Espy's review. Based on this lack of connectivity, Sun-Diamond challenged its indictment but lost in district court. On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia reserved part of the district court decision and the government appealed. Supreme Court granted certiorari.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1998/1998_98_131/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
