<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Criminal Procedure Issues - Timeliness Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/criminal-procedure/timeliness/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Announcements, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <itunes:image>http://www.oyez.org/images/oyezfeed.jpg</itunes:image>
  <itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations"/>
  <itunes:author>The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</itunes:author>
    <itunes:subtitle>U.S. Supreme Court Audio Recordings, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</itunes:subtitle>
    
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>New York v. Hill - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2000 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>&lt;p&gt;Does a defense counsel's agreement to a trial date outside the 180-day time period required by Article III of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers waive the defendant's right to a speedy trial?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_1299/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_1299/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1999/1999_98_1299/opinion/98-1299_20000111-opinion.mp3" length="951193" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 1995 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>&lt;p&gt;Is state law the proper source of the limitations period for civil actions brought to enforce the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_834/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_834/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_834/opinion/94-834_19950530-opinion.mp3" length="558089" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      <item>
       <title>United States v. Alvarez-Sanchez - Opinion Announcement</title>
       <pubDate>Mon, 02 May 1994 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
       <description>&lt;p&gt;Does federal statute 18 U.S.C. Section 3501(c), declaring separate charge-based confessions inadmissible if obtained after the first six hours of detention, apply to suspects that are held only on state or federal charges?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
       <guid>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1812/opinion/</guid>
       <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1812/opinion/</link>
       <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1812/opinion/92-1812_19940502-opinion.mp3" length="766807" type="audio/mpeg"/>
      </item>
     
    
   
  
 </channel>
</rss>
