<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Criminal Procedure Issues - Presentation,  Admissibility, or Sufficiency of Evidence Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/criminal-procedure/presentation/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Bushnell v. Ellis</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1960-1969/1960/1960_561/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Carchman v. Nash</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1984/1984_84_776/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Cuyler v. Adams</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1980/1980_78_1841/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Haines v. Kerner</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1971/1971_70_5025/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Lee Kum Hoy v. Murff</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_32/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Old Chief v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Does a District Court have the authority to reject a defendant's offer to conceded a prior conviction and admit the prosecution's presentation of it when the name or nature of the conviction raises the risk of a verdict tainted by improper considerations, and when the purpose of the evidence is solely to prove the element of prior conviction?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No. In an opinion authored by Justice David Souter, the Court ruled that a district court abuses its discretion under the Federal Rules of Evidence if it spurns a defendant's offer to concede a prior judgment and admits the full judgment record over the defendant's objection, when the name or nature of the prior offense raises the risk of a verdict tainted by improper considerations, and when the purpose of the evidence is solely to prove the element of prior conviction.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1996/1996_95_6556/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Rogers v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_6336/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Stirone v. United States</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1959/1959_35/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Dunnigan</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_1300/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Salerno</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_91_872/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Shotwell Mfg. Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1950-1959/1957/1957_1/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>United States v. Williams</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_1972/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
