The Oyez Project: Civil Rights Issues - Sex Discrimination in Employment Arguments

Anderson v. Bessemer City - Oral Argument

Mon, 03 Dec 1984 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. - Oral Argument

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:00:00 -0500

Jennifer Arbaugh, a waitress at the Moonlight Cafe in Louisiana, sued her employer, the Y&H Corporation, for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. The federal district court jury ruled for Arbaugh. Filing a motion to dismiss, Y&H claimed it did not qualify as an employer under Title VII, because it did not employ 15 or more employees for 20 or more calendar weeks during the relevant time period. The district court then reversed the jury judgment, holding that the number of employees determines a court's subject matter jurisdiction in a Title VII suit. The Fifth Circuit affirmed.

Arizona Governing Committee v. Norris - Oral Argument

Mon, 28 Mar 1983 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Automobile Workers v. Johnson Controls, Inc. - Oral Argument

Wed, 10 Oct 1990 12:00:00 -0500

Johnson Controls, Inc. ("Johnson") manufactures batteries whose assembly process entails exposure to high levels of lead. After discovering that eight of its female employees became pregnant while maintaining blood lead levels in excess of those thought safe by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Johnson barred all its female employees - accepting those with medically documented infertility - from engaging in tasks that require exposure to lead in access of recommended OSHA levels. Following its passage, the United Automobile Workers (UAW) challenged Johnson's fetal-protection policy as sexually discriminatory in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (Act). When the Appellate Court affirmed a district court decision in favor of Johnson, the UAW appealed and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth - Oral Argument

Wed, 22 Apr 1998 12:00:00 -0500

After working for Burlington Industries for 15 months, Kimberly B. Ellerth quit because she allegedly suffered sexual harassment by her supervisor - Ted Slowik. Despite her refusals of Slowik's advances Ellerth did not suffer any tangible retaliation and was, in fact, promoted once. Moreover, while she remained silent about Slowik's conduct despite her knowledge of Burlington's policy against sexual harassment, Ellerth challenged Burlington claiming that the company forced her constructive discharge.

Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Co. v. White - Oral Argument

Mon, 17 Apr 2006 12:00:00 -0500

Sheila White was the only woman working in the Maintenance of Way Department of the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad's Tennessee Yard. After she complained of harassment by her supervisor, White was moved from duties as a forklift operator to less desirable duties as a track laborer, though her job classification remained the same. She was also suspended for 37 days without pay, but was eventually reinstated and given full back pay.

White filed suit in federal court, where a jury rejected her claims of sex discrimination but awarded her damages of $43,000 after finding that she had been retaliated against for her complaints, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On appeal, Burlington Northern argued that White had not suffered "adverse employment action," and therefore could not bring the suit, because she had not been fired, demoted, denied a promotion, or denied wages. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, finding that the suspension without pay - even if back pay was eventually awarded - was an "adverse employment action," as was the change of responsibilities within the same job category.

California Federal S. & L. Assn. v. Guerra - Oral Argument

Wed, 08 Oct 1986 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

County Of Washington v. Gunther - Oral Argument

Mon, 23 Mar 1981 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Davis v. Passman - Oral Argument

Tue, 27 Feb 1979 12:00:00 -0500

Davis, a former employee of Louisiana Congressman Otto Passman, charged Passman with violating her Fifth Amendment right to due process. Prior to the time of her firing Passman wrote a note explaining that, even though he knew Davis as an "able, energetic, and a hard, hard worker", he preferred a man to work in her position. The Court of Appeals ruled that Davis had no civil remedies under the Fifth Amendment due process requirement.

Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa - Oral Argument

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 12:00:00 -0500

Catharina Costa was fired from her job as a heavy equipment operator at Desert Palace Casino. She filed a sexual discrimination lawsuit, charging that the firing was the culmination of discrimination that had occurred during her employment. Jurors during the trial were instructed by the judge to rule for Costa if they determined that sex was a motivating factor in the firing, even if other (legal) factors were present as well. The jury ruled for Costa. Desert Palace appealed, saying that the instructions incorrectly shifted the burden of proof to the defendant in the case. A three judge panel from the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, ruling for the casino, but a subsequent review of the case by all 11 judges of the 11th Circuit reversed the panel's decision.

Dothard v. Rawlinson - Oral Argument

Tue, 19 Apr 1977 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Faragher v. City of Boca Raton - Oral Argument

Wed, 25 Mar 1998 12:00:00 -0500

After resigning as a lifeguard, Beth Ann Faragher brought an action against the City of Boca Raton and her immediate supervisors, alleging that the supervisors had created a sexually hostile atmosphere by touching, remarking, and commenting. Faragher asserted that this conduct constituted discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The District Court concluded that Faragher's supervisors' conduct was sufficiently serious to alter the conditions of her employment and constitute an abusive working environment. The court then held that the city could be held liable. In reversing, the en banc Court of Appeals held that Faragher's supervisors were not acting within the scope of their employment when they engaged in the harassing conduct, that knowledge of the harassment could not be imputed to the City, and that the City could not be held liable for negligence in failing to prevent it.

Florida v. Long - Oral Argument

Mon, 22 Feb 1988 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

General Electric Co. v. Gilbert - Oral Argument, Part 1

Mon, 19 Jan 1976 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

General Electric Co. v. Gilbert - Oral Argument, Part 2

Mon, 19 Jan 1976 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

General Electric Co. v. Gilbert - Oral Reargument

Wed, 13 Oct 1976 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Harris v. Forklift Sys. - Oral Argument

Wed, 13 Oct 1993 12:00:00 -0500

Teresa Harris was sexually harassed by her employer. She filed suit in federal district court, claiming that the harassment created an "abusive work environment" in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The employer countered that the harassment had not been severe enough to seriously affect her psychologically or impair her ability to work, and that it therefore did not create an abusive work environment under the meaning of Title VII. The district court agreed, stating that the decision was a "close case" but that the harassment had not been severe enough to create an abusive work environment in violation of the Act. A Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed the district court's decision.

Hishon v. King & Spalding - Oral Argument

Mon, 31 Oct 1983 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Los Angeles Dept. Of Water & Power v. Manhart - Oral Argument

Wed, 18 Jan 1978 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Mckennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Co. - Oral Argument

Wed, 02 Nov 1994 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson - Oral Argument

Tue, 25 Mar 1986 12:00:00 -0500

After being dismissed from her job at a Meritor Savings Bank, Mechelle Vinson sued Sidney Taylor, the Vice President of the bank. Vinson charged that she had constantly been subjected to sexual harassment by Taylor over her four years at the bank. She argued such harassment created a "hostile working environment" and was covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vinson sought injunctive relief along with compensatory and punitive damages against Taylor and the bank.

Nashville Gas Co. v. Satty - Oral Argument

Wed, 05 Oct 1977 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock v. EEOC - Oral Argument

Wed, 27 Apr 1983 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. - Oral Argument

Wed, 03 Dec 1997 12:00:00 -0500

Joseph Oncale, a male, filed a complaint against his employer, Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., alleging that he was sexually harassed by co-workers, in their workplace, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"). On appeal from a decision supporting a district court's ruling against Oncale, the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Pennsylvania State Police v. Suders - Oral Argument

Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:00:00 -0500

Nancy Drew Suders quit her job as a dispatcher for the Pennsylvania State Police in August 1998. She claimed that she had been sexually harassed by her supervisors since she got the job in March of that year, and that she had finally decided to quit after she was accused of theft, handcuffed, photographed and questioned. Two days before quitting, she had contacted the state police equal opportunity officer about the harassment, but did not file a report because, Suders claimed, the woman was unhelpful and unsympathetic.

Suders then filed suit in federal district court, charging that the harassment had forced her to quit. The district court judge, however, granted summary judgment to the state police before the case went to trial. He found that Suders had failed to use the internal procedures set up by the state police to deal with sexual harassment, and that she therefore could not bring suit unless the police had taken a "tangible employment action" that substantially changed her employment status. On appeal, a Third Circuit Court of Appeals panel overturned the district judge's decision, ruling that the harassment had been so bad that Suders had no choice but to quit. While the police had not fired Suders, they had been directly responsible for her resignation and therefore could not use her failure to file a report as a defense.

Pollard v. DuPont - Oral Argument

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:00:00 -0500

Sharon Pollard sued her former employer, E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont), alleging that she had been subjected to a hostile work environment based on her sex, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Ultimately, the Federal District Court found that Pollard was subjected to co-worker sexual harassment of which her supervisors were aware. The court awarded her $300,000 in compensatory damages, the maximum permitted under the Civil Rights Act of 1991 for such damages. The court then noted that the award was insufficient to compensate Pollard. On appeal, Pollard argued that "front pay," the money awarded for lost compensation during the period between judgment and reinstatement or in lieu of reinstatement, was not an element of compensatory damages, but a replacement for the remedy of reinstatement in situations in which reinstatement would be inappropriate. Rejecting Pollard, the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins - Oral Argument

Mon, 31 Oct 1988 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Richmond Unified School District v. Berg - Oral Argument

Wed, 05 Oct 1977 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Wimberly v. Labor & Industrial Rel. Comm'n - Oral Argument

Tue, 09 Dec 1986 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.