<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" version="2.0">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Civil Rights Issues - Residency Requirements, Active Duty Arguments</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/civil-rights/residency-requirements-active-duty/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <itunes:image>http://www.oyez.org/images/oyezfeed.jpg</itunes:image>
  <itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations"/>
      <itunes:subtitle>U.S. Supreme Court Audio Recordings, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</itunes:subtitle>
    
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Conroy v. Aniskoff - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1993 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>91-1353_19930111-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_1353/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_1353/argument/91-1353_19930111-argument.mp3" length="12200353" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Loving v. United States - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 1996 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;A general court-martial found Dwight J. Loving, an Army private, guilty of both premeditated murder and felony murder under Article 118 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The court-martial sentenced Loving to death based on the aggravating factors that the premeditated murder was committed during a robbery and that he had committed a second murder. The commander who convened the court-martial approved the findings and sentence. In affirming, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces rejected Loving's contention that the President lacked the authority to prescribe aggravating factors in capital murder cases that enabled the court-martial to sentence him to death. Loving claimed that the separation-of-powers principle prevented the President from promulgating the Executive Order.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Does the President have the authority, consistent with the separation-of-powers principle, to prescribe aggravating factors that permit a court-martial to impose the death penalty upon a member of the armed forces convicted of murder?&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
        <guid>94-1966_19960109-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_1966/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1995/1995_94_1966/argument/94-1966_19960109-argument.mp3" length="13981889" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Ryder v. United States - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 1995 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;James Ryder, an enlisted member of the Coast Guard, was convicted of drug offenses by a court-martial. The Coast Guard Court of Military Review affirmed. On rehearing, the court rejected Ryder's claim that its composition violated the Appointments Clause because two of the judges on the three-judge panel were civilians appointed by the General Counsel of the Department of Transportation. The Court of Military Appeals agreed with Ryder that the appointments violated the Clause under its previous decision in United States v. Carpenter that appellate military judges are inferior officers who must be appointed by a President, a court of law, or a head of a department. The court nonetheless affirmed Ryder's conviction on the ground that the actions of the two civilian judges were valid de facto.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Is it proper to accord de facto validity to the actions of civilian judges on a military appellate panel, when the accused challenges the composition of the panel as a violation of the Constitution's Appointments Clause?&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
        <guid>94-431_19950418-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_431/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1994/1994_94_431/argument/94-431_19950418-argument.mp3" length="13576807" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Schick v. Reed - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 1974 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>&lt;p&gt;Schick, a master sergeant in the Army, was convicted of murder in a military court and sentenced to death in 1954. President Eisenhower intervened and commuted his sentence in 1960, reducing it to life imprisonment without parole.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
        <itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Did Eisenhower exceed his powers to commute criminal sentences?&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary>
        <guid>73-5677_19741023-lq-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_5677/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_5677/argument/73-5677_19741023-lq-argument.mp3" length="12407904" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Solorio v. United States - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 1987 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>85-1581_19870224-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1581/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1986/1986_85_1581/argument/85-1581_19870224-argument.mp3" length="12059526" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>United States v. Larionoff - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 1977 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>76-413_19770427-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_76_413/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1976/1976_76_413/argument/76-413_19770427-argument.mp3" length="15382792" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>Weiss v. United States - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 1993 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>92-1482_19931103-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1482/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1993/1993_92_1482/argument/92-1482_19931103-argument.mp3" length="12370775" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
   
    
     
      
       <item>
        <title>William "Sky" King v. St. Vincent's Hospital - Oral Argument</title>
        <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 1991 12:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
                <description>No details yet.</description>
        <itunes:summary>No details yet.</itunes:summary>
        <guid>90-889_19911016-argument</guid>
        <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_889/argument/</link>
        <enclosure url="http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1991/1991_90_889/argument/90-889_19911016-argument.mp3" length="15026048" type="audio/mpeg"/>
        
        <itunes:keywords>supreme, court, oyez, rehnquist</itunes:keywords>
       </item>
      
      
     
    
   
  
 </channel>
</rss>
