The Oyez Project: Civil Rights Issues - Juveniles Arguments

Ankenbrandt, As Next Friend And Mother Of L. R. v. Richards - Oral Argument

Tue, 31 Mar 1992 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

DeShaney v. Winnebago County - Oral Argument

Wed, 02 Nov 1988 12:00:00 -0500

In 1984, four-year-old Joshua DeShaney became comatose and then profoundly retarded due to traumatic head injuries inflicted by his father who physically beat him over a long period of time. The Winnebago County Department of Social Services took various steps to protect the child after receiving numerous complaints of the abuse; however, the Department did not act to remove Joshua from his father's custody. Joshua DeShaney's mother subsequently sued the Winnebago County Department of Social Services, alleging that the Department had deprived the child of his "liberty interest in bodily integrity, in violation of his rights under the substantive component of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, by failing to intervene to protect him against his father's violence."

Durst v. United States - Oral Argument

Mon, 05 Dec 1977 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

In re Gault - Oral Argument

Fri, 16 Dec 1966 12:00:00 -0500

Gerald Francis Gault, fifteen years old, was taken into custody for allegedly making an obscene phone call. Gault had previously been placed on probation. The police did not leave notice with Gault's parents, who were at work, when the youth was arrested. After proceedings before a juvenile court judge, Gault was committed to the State Industrial School until he reached the age of 21.

In re Winship - Oral Argument

Tue, 20 Jan 1970 12:00:00 -0500

At age twelve, Samuel Winship was arrested and charged as a juvenile delinquent for breaking into a woman's locker and stealing $112 from her pocketbook. The charge also alleged that had Winship's act been done by an adult, it would constitute larceny. Relying on Section 744(b) of the New York Family Court Act, which provided that determinations of juvenile's guilt be based on a preponderance of the evidence, a Family Court found Winship guilty, despite acknowledging that the evidence did not establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Winship's appeal of the court's use of the lower "preponderance of the evidence" burden of proof, was rejected in both the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court and in the New York Court of Appeals before the Supreme Court granted certiorari.

M.L.B V. S.L.J. - Oral Argument

Mon, 07 Oct 1996 12:00:00 -0500

In 1994, a Mississippi Chancery Court terminated M.L.B.'s parental rights to her two minor children. M.L.B. filed a timely appeal from the termination decree, but Mississippi law conditioned her right to appeal on prepayment of record preparation fees estimated at $2,352.36. Because she lacked the funds, M.L.B. sought leave to appeal in forma pauperis. The Supreme Court of Mississippi denied her application on the ground that, under its precedent, there is no right to proceed in forma pauperis in civil appeals. In front of the U.S. Supreme Court, M.L.B. argued that a State may not, consistent with the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, condition appeals from trial court decrees terminating parental rights on the affected parent's ability to pay record preparation fees.

New Jersey v. T.L.O. - Oral Argument

Wed, 28 Mar 1984 12:00:00 -0500

T.L.O. was a fourteen-year-old; she was accused of smoking in the girls' bathroom of her high school. A principal at the school questioned her and searched her purse, yielding a bag of marijuana and other drug paraphernalia.

New Jersey v. T.L.O. - Oral Reargument

Tue, 02 Oct 1984 12:00:00 -0500

Parham v. J. R. - Oral Argument

Tue, 06 Dec 1977 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Schall v. Martin - Oral Argument

Tue, 17 Jan 1984 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Swisher v. Brady - Oral Argument

Wed, 29 Mar 1978 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Tuten v. United States - Oral Argument

Tue, 01 Mar 1983 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

United States v. R. L. C. - Oral Argument

Tue, 10 Dec 1991 12:00:00 -0500

No details yet.

Washington Dept. of Social & Health Services v. Guardianship of Keffeler - Oral Argument

Tue, 03 Dec 2002 12:00:00 -0500

The State of Washington, through its Department of Social and Health Services, provides foster care to certain children. It also receives and manages Social Security benefits, which it uses to cover its costs, for many of those children. Such beneficiary children filed suit, alleging that the Department's use of their benefits to reimburse itself for the foster care costs violated the "anti-attachment" provision of Title II of the Social Security Act, which protects certain benefits from "execution, levy, attachment, garnishment, or other legal process." The trial court enjoined the Department from continuing to charge its foster care costs against Social Security benefits and ordered restitution of previous reimbursement transfers. The Washington Supreme Court ultimately affirmed the trial court's holding that the Department's practices violated the anti-attachment provision.