<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="0.91">
 <channel>
  <title>The Oyez Project: Civil Rights Issues - Employability of Aliens Decisions</title>
  <link>http://www.oyez.org/issues/civil-rights/employability-of-aliens/</link>
  <description>U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, presented by The Oyez Project (www.oyez.org)</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  
   <item>
    <title>Ambach v. Norwick</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1978/1978_76_808/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Bernal v. Fainter</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_83_630/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Cabell v. Chavez-Salido</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1981/1981_80_990/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>De Canas v. Bica</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_882/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co.</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1973/1973_72_671/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Examining Board v. Flores De Otero</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1975/1975_74_1267/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Foley v. Connelie</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Did the New York law violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a 6-to-3 decision, the Court held that the states had an "historical power to exclude aliens from participation in its democratic political institutions" and that the New York statute did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. Noting that states need only to show some rational relationship between a valid state interest and a classification involving aliens, the Court held that the police function was "one of the basic functions of government" and thereby the province of actual United States citizens.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1977/1977_76_839/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_1596/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>In Re Griffiths</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1972/1972_71_1336/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Saxbe v. Bustos</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1974/1974_73_300/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Sugarman v. Dougall</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1970-1979/1972/1972_71_1222/</link>
   </item>
  
   <item>
    <title>Sure-Tan, Inc. v. NLRB</title>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;No details yet.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <link>http://www.oyez.org/cases/1980-1989/1983/1983_82_945/</link>
   </item>
  
 </channel>
</rss>
