ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
13-553
Petitioner 
Alabama Department of Revenue, et al.
Respondent 
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Term:
Facts of the Case 

Alabama imposes a 4% sales tax on the gross receipts of retail businesses and a 4% use tax on storage, use, or consumption of tangible personal property. Accordingly, rail carriers that purchase diesel fuel within the state are subject to a 4% sales tax. However, motor and water carriers that purchase fuel in Alabama pay an excise tax of $0.19 per gallon.

In 2008, CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX) sued the Alabama Department of Revenue for violating the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1974 (4-R Act), which targeted local and state taxation schemes that discriminated against rail carriers. CSX argued that the sales tax was discriminatory because it required the rail carriers to pay more than their competitors for purchasing diesel fuel in the state. The district court dismissed the case and U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal by citing precedent that held that a railroad could not challenge its competitors’ exemptions from a sales tax as discriminatory under the 4-R Act. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, overturned the ruling, and remanded the case. On remand, the district court conducted a bench trial and issued an order holding that the state’s sales tax does not discriminate against rail carriers for the purposes of the 4-R Act, because the amount that motor carriers paid was roughly equal to that paid by rail carriers. The Court of Appeals reversed the lower court’s decision and held that the tax is discriminatory because the state had not offered sufficient justification for exempting CSX’s competitors from the sales tax.

Question 

Does a state violate the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory Reform Act of 1974 when it requires rail carriers to pay a sales-and-use tax but exempts the railroad’s competitors?

In resolving such a claim, should a court consider other aspects of the state’s tax scheme rather than focusing solely on the challenged provision?

Cite this Page
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 17 November 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/2014_13_553>.
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/2014_13_553 (last visited November 17, 2014).
"ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed November 17, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2014/2014_13_553.