SANDIFER v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
12-417
Petitioner 
Clifton Sandifer, et al.
Respondent 
United States Steel Corporation
Term:
Facts of the Case 

Workers at the United Steel Corporation brought a class action suit against the company arguing that the Fair Labor Standards Act required the company to compensate them for time spent changing into and out of work clothes and the transit time from the locker room to their work stations. The Act states that an employer does not need to compensate employees for time spent “changing clothes.” United States Steel Corporation moved for summary judgment. The district court granted the motion as it relates to compensation for changing clothes but not in relation to compensation for transit time.

The company appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that Act did not require the company to compensate the employees for either the time spent changing or the time spent in transit between the locker room and the work stations.

Question 

Does changing into required safety gear constitute “changing clothes” under the Fair Labor Standards Act?

Cite this Page
SANDIFER v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 26 April 2013. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_417>.
SANDIFER v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_417 (last visited April 26, 2013).
"SANDIFER v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed April 26, 2013, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_417.