HIGHMARK v. ALLCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

Print this Page
Case Basics
Docket No. 
12-1163
Petitioner 
Highmark, Inc.
Respondent 
Allcare Management Systems, Inc.
Term:
Facts of the Case 

The Patent Act allows a court to award reasonable attorneys fees in exceptional cases in which the lawsuit is objectively baseless and brought in bad faith. Allcare Management Systems, Inc. (Allcare) owns a patent that covers a computer-based method of generating treatment options based on symptom data entered by a physician. This process can help an insurance company determine whether to approve a particular treatment for a patient. In 2003, Highmark, Inc. (Highmark), a health insurance company, sought a declaratory judgment of non-infringement of Allcare’s patent. Allcare filed a counterclaim and alleged that Highmark infringed on two sections of its patent. The federal district court awarded summary judgment in favor of Highmark. The court also found that Allcare had willfully pursued frivolous infringement claims and ordered it to pay Highmark’s attorney’s fees and costs. On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit independently reviewed the district court’s determination that Allcare’s claims were objectively baseless. The appellate court affirmed the lower court’s finding with respect to one of Allcare’s claims and reversed the court regarding Allcare’s second claim.

Question 

Did the appellate court apply an improper standard of review to the district court’s determination that Allcare pursued objectively baseless claims against Highmark?

Cite this Page
HIGHMARK v. ALLCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. 15 April 2014. <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_1163>.
HIGHMARK v. ALLCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_1163 (last visited April 15, 2014).
"HIGHMARK v. ALLCARE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS," The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law, accessed April 15, 2014, http://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2013/2013_12_1163.