Pottawattamie County v. McGhee

Media Items
Advocates
Stephen Sanders (pro hac vice, for the petitioners)
Neal K. Katyal (Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting the petitioners)
Paul D. Clement (for the respondents)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
08-1065
Petitioner: 
Pottawattamie County, Iowa, et al.
Respondent: 
Curtis W. McGhee, Jr., et al.
Location No location information present.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Pottawattamie County v. McGhee U.S. ___
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2009/2009_08_1065)
Facts of the Case: 

In 1978, Curtis W. McGhee Jr. and Terry Harrington were convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment by an Iowa state court. In 2002, Mr. McGhee's and Mr. Harrington's convictions were reversed because the prosecutor at their trial improperly withheld evidence of an alternative suspect. Subsequently, Mr. McGhee and Mr. Harrington filed civil claims in an Iowa federal court against Pottawattamie County, Iowa, and the prosecutors and officers involved in their prosecution. The defendants moved for summary judgment arguing that they were absolutely immune to civil prosecution. The district court found some defendants immune to certain claims, but denied immunity to other defendants on the other claims. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted interlocutory appeal on the question of whether the prosecutors were absolutely immune to civil prosecution.

The Eighth Circuit held that the prosecutors were not immune from claims that they violated Mr. McGhee's and Mr. Harrington's due process rights. The court reasoned that allegations that prosecutors obtained, manufactured, coerced, and fabricated evidence did not fall within "a distinctly prosecutorial function" and thus the prosecutors were not immune to the claims.

Question: 

May a prosecutor be subject to civil prosecution when he allegedly violated the criminal defendants' substantial due process rights by fabricating evidence and then introducing it at trial against the defendants?

Timeplots Affiliate

Timeplots.com: A Visual History of the Supreme Court