Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick

Media Items
Advocates
Charles S. Sims (argued the cause for the petiioners)
Ginger Anders (Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, for the United States as amicus curiae)
Deborah Jones Merritt (argued the cause for amicus curiae in support of the judgment below (appointed by the Court))
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
08-103
Petitioner: 
Reed Elsevier, Inc., et al.
Respondent: 
Irvin Muchnick, et al.

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Reed Elsevier v. Muchnick U.S. ___
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2008/2008_08_103)
Facts of the Case: 

A federal district court in New York approved an $18 million settlement in a class-action brought by freelance writers who had contracted with the defendant publishers to publish their works in print. Without authorization, the publishers reproduced the works for electronic distribution. Muchnick and others objected to the settlement.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit overturned the settlement on the ground that the trial court lacked jurisdiction over claims relating to unregistered works. The court stated that the Copyright Act grants the federal district courts jurisdiction only over those claims that arise from registered works. Since the vast majority of the claimants in the litigation based their claims on unregistered works, the federal district court did not have the power to certify a class in the litigation.

Question: 

Does Section 411(a) of the Copyright Act restrict subject matter jurisdiction of federal courts over copyright infringement actions?