|
Abstract
|
Advocates
|
Facts of the Case
This case examines the correct application of federal antidumping statutes to so-called "separate work unit" (SWU) contracts for the production of low enriched uranium (LEU). The case, brought by the federal government and the United States Enrichment Corporation, has been consolidated from two cases both alleging that Eurodif, a French corporation, imported LEU in violation of federal antidumping laws. Based on a decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit holding that SWU contracts for the production of LEU are contracts for services rather than goods and are therefore immune from the antidumping laws, the U.S. Department of Commerce excluded all LEU entering the country from antidumping regulations if accompanied by a certificate that the uranium was imported under an SWU contract. The Court of International Trade sustained the Commerce Department decision.
On appeal, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed the case, saying that it was "unripe" for judicial review. The court held that the issues raised by the government only concerned the application of the Department's decision regarding future importation of LEU; and, therefore, the court did not have a specific factual context in which to review the claim.
Question
Should federal antidumping laws be applicable to the importation of low enriched uranium when the entry is made pursuant to a "separate work unit contract"?
Conclusion
None
Cite this page
The Oyez Project, United States v. Eurodif S.A., (No. 07-1059),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2008/2008_07_1059/>
(last visited ).