Watson v. United States

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Karl J. Koch (on behalf of the Petitioner)
Deanne E. Maynard (on behalf of the Respondent)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
06-571
Petitioner: 
Michael A. Watson
Respondent: 
United States

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Watson v. United States U.S. ___
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_571)
Facts of the Case: 

Michael Watson was arrested for trading illegal drugs for an unloaded semi-automatic pistol. He was convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to 262 months in prison. Since Watson's crime involved a gun, his sentence included an additional 60 months. The extra jail time was imposed under 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A), which punishes any drug trafficker who "uses or carries" a firearm during a drug deal. In Smith v. United States, the Supreme Court had ruled that a defendant who trades a gun for drugs "uses" it for purposes of the statute. However, the Court clarified in Bailey v. United States that "use" means "active employment" of a firearm; mere possession of the firearm does not necessarily constitute use.

On appeal, Watson argued that the firearm was not used in his case. He stressed that the gun was never loaded and was in his possession for only moments before he was arrested. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected Watson's arguments and affirmed the lower court. Following Circuit precedents, it ruled that Watson had used the gun under the statute's meaning of "use."

Question: 

Does the receipt of an unloaded firearm as payment for drugs constitute "use" of a firearm during a drug trafficking offense for purposes of federal law?

Conclusion: 

None

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for Watson, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 18 U.S.C. 924

Sort by Seniority

Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Wrote a special concurrence
Ginsburg
Wrote the majority opinion
Souter
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Alito
Voted with the majority
Roberts
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas

Full Opinion by Justice David H. Souter