The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Granted: Monday, December 12, 2005
Argument: Wednesday, April 26, 2006
Decision: Monday, June 5, 2006
Issues: Judicial Power, Standing to Sue, Statutory Standing

Advocates

Howard W. Foster (argued the cause for Respondents)
Carter G. Phillips (argued the cause for Petitioner)
Malcolm L. Stewart (argued the cause for Respondents)

Facts of the Case

A group of current and former employees of Mohawk Industries brought suit against Mohawk in federal district court under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). They claimed that Mohawk had conspired with third-party employment recruiters to bring illegal immigrants into Georgia to work for the company, and that the resulting competition for jobs hurt the legal workers. Mohawk asked the court to dismiss the case because, it argued, the plaintiffs had not shown that there were two distinct entities involved in the illegal activity as required under RICO. The only parties involved were the Mohawk corporation and the third-party recruiters, which were acting as its "agents." Mohawk argued that, because the recruiters were working on behalf of the corporation rather than in cooperation with (but distinct from) it, they should not be considered separate entities. The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, ruling that the recruiters and the corporation were distinct and that RICO could therefore apply.

Question

May a corporation be held liable under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act for actions in which only it and its non-employee agents were involved?

Conclusion

Not answered. In a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court dismissed the case as improvidently granted. They sent it back to the Eleventh Circuit to be considered in light of Anza v. Ideal Steel Corporation, another RICO case decided while Mohawk was pending before the Court.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Mohawk Industries, 0 vote(s) against
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Roberts
Voted with the majority
Alito
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Per Curiam with Argument

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Mohawk Industries v. Williams, 547 U.S. ___ (2006),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2005/2005_05_465/>
(last visited ).