Lockhart v. United States

Media Items
Oral Argument
Get Adobe Flash Player
Opinion Announcement
Get Adobe Flash Player
Advocates
Lisa Schiavo Blatt (argued the cause for Respondents)
Brian Wolfman (argued the cause for Petitioner)
Case Basics
Docket No.: 
04-881
Petitioner: 
James Lockhart
Respondent: 
United States, et al.
Opinion: 
546 U.S. ___ (2005)

Cite this page
The Oyez Project, Lockhart v. United States , 546 U.S. ___ (2005)
available at: (http://oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2005/2005_04_881)
Facts of the Case: 

In 2002 the U.S. began withholding a portion of Lockhart's Social Security payments to offset his debt on federally reinsured student loans that were more than 10 years overdue. Lockhart sued, arguing the offset was barred by the 10-year statute of limitations of the Debt Collection Act (1982). The district court dismissed Lockhart's suit, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed.

Question: 

Could the United States offset Social Security benefits to collect a student loan debt that had been outstanding for over 10 years?

Conclusion: 

Yes. In a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court held that the Debt Collection Improvement Act made Social Security benefits subject to offset and that the Higher Education Technical Amendments removed the 10-year limit that would otherwise bar the offset.

Decisions

Decision: 9 votes for United States, 0 vote(s) against
Legal provision: 31 U.S.C. 3716

Sort by Ideology

Voted with the majority
Roberts
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Wrote the majority opinion
O'Connor
Wrote a regular concurrence
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer

Full Opinion by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor