The Oyez Project Virtual Tour of the Supreme Court Building

Abstract

Granted: Monday, June 28, 2004
Argument: Monday, November 29, 2004
Decision: Monday, January 24, 2005
Issues: Judicial Power, Writ Improvidently Granted

Advocates

James M. Hood, III (argued the cause for Respondent)
Ronnie M. Mitchell (argued the cause for Petitioner)

Facts of the Case

A Mississippi court convicted Marlon Howell of capital murder - murder committed during a felony - and sentenced him to death. Howell appealed and argued the trial court was wrong to deny the jury the option of finding Howell guilty of the lesser offenses of non-capital murder or manslaughter, for which the death penalty would not have been an option. The Mississippi Supreme Court ruled against Howell and said there was no evidence to support lesser charges.

Question

1.) In death penalty cases can a state court refuse to give a jury the option of finding a defendant guilty of at least one lesser offense if it is recognized by state law and supported by evidence? 2.) Was Howell's federal constitutional claim properly raised before the Mississippi Supreme Court?

Conclusion

In a unanimous per curiam opinion, the Court dismissed the case because Howell had not first raised his federal constitutional claims in state court.

Supreme Court Justice Opinions and Votes (by Ideology)

Sort by Seniority
(More information here)
Decision: 9 votes for Mississippi, 0 vote(s) against
Legal Provision: 28 U.S.C. 1257
Voted with the majority
Stevens
Voted with the majority
Souter
Voted with the majority
Ginsburg
Voted with the majority
Breyer
Voted with the majority
O'Connor
Voted with the majority
Kennedy
Voted with the majority
Rehnquist
Voted with the majority
Scalia
Voted with the majority
Thomas
Per Curiam with Argument

Cite this page

The Oyez Project, Howell v. Mississippi, 543 U.S. 440 (2005),
available at: <http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2004/2004_03_9560/>
(last visited ).